探花合集

American Society of Addiciton Medicine
Jul 22, 2024 Reporting from Rockville, MD
The Role of Pharmacists in Medications for Addiction Treatment
/blog-details/public-policy-statements/2024/07/22/the-role-of-pharmacists-in-medications-for-addiction-treatment
Jul 22, 2024
Pharmacists help to ensure the safe and effective use of addiction medications, such as buprenorphine, the most commonly used medication for the treatment opioid use disorder (OUD) that can be prescribed or dispensed in clinicians鈥 offices. Despite buprenorphine鈥檚 distinct mechanism of action, safety, effectiveness, and lower risk classification than full opioid agonists under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), some pharmacies still associate significant risk with ordering and dispensing buprenorphine, possibly conflating harms associated with diversion of medications like oxycodone and alprazolam with buprenorphine鈥檚 diversion risks.

The Role of Pharmacists in Medications for Addiction Treatment.Substring(0, maxlength)

American Society of Addictin Medicine

Blog

The Role of Pharmacists in Medications for Addiction Treatment

Introduction

Well over two million Americans have died from an alcohol-related cause or drug-related overdose since 2000, exposing at least forty times as many Americans to devastating personal loss.1–9 Medication, specifically indicated and prescribed for addiction, is fundamental to effective treatment.10 While utilization rates remain low,11,12 addiction medications are cost effective, reduce harmful substance use and related morbidity and mortality, improve health outcomes, and enhance quality of life.13–21

Pharmacists help to ensure the safe and effective use of addiction medications, such as buprenorphine, the most commonly used medication for the treatment opioid use disorder (OUD) that can be prescribed or dispensed in clinicians’ offices.22 Despite buprenorphine’s distinct mechanism of action,23 safety, effectiveness, and lower risk classification than full opioid agonists under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), some pharmacies still associate significant risk with ordering and dispensing buprenorphine, possibly conflating harms associated with diversion of medications like oxycodone and alprazolam with buprenorphine’s diversion risks.22,24 Notably, the use of diverted buprenorphine is largely associated with unmet treatment needs.25 Nationally, buprenorphine comprised an estimated 1% of drugs identified in all reports submitted to federal, state, and local forensic laboratories from law enforcement operations in 2022.25–27

Challenges to accessing buprenorphine at pharmacies are not always well-understood or clearly identified, nor have they been addressed sufficiently. Relatedly, settlement terms of large lawsuits involving pharmaceutical manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and retail chain pharmacies likely intensified pharmacies’ risk concerns.28,29 These terms have not been revisited or amended by state attorneys general to ensure adequate pharmacy access to medications for OUD (MOUD) or overdose reversal, specifically.

Pharmacies are crucial to accessing and improving the utilization of medications for addiction treatment, however. Pharmacies are highly accessible nearly everywhere; there are over 61,000 community pharmacies employing over 140,000 pharmacists in the U.S.30–32 Congress recognized the importance of pharmacies in improving long-term health outcomes when including medication therapy management programs33 in Medicare’s 2003 outpatient prescription drug benefit,34 and all states have enacted policies allowing “collaborative pharmacy practice” enabling pharmacists to provide “direct patient care services35 under certain conditions.36,37 Simultaneously, however, states highly regulate the practice of pharmacy, resulting in such sheer variability across states that discerning the best public policy practices among states is a challenge.36,38–41 Furthermore, while elimination of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) ‘X-waiver’ has had minimal demonstrated impact on buprenorphine utilization rates thus far,42 it is an important opportunity for states to remove barriers to forms of collaborative pharmacy practice for the treatment of OUD.43,44  

Notwithstanding collaborative pharmacy practice opportunities, states usually prevent pharmacists from making patient diagnoses or performing differential diagnoses through scope of practice limitations;38,39,45–47 considering training variability, a pharmacist’s corresponding responsibility in DEA regulations, and risks associated with misdiagnosis. Finally, there are significant barriers to implementation and scalability that limit the effectiveness of direct patient care services delivered in community pharmacies.34,48–50

Background

Challenges at Pharmacies to Accessing Addiction Medications

While challenges to accessing buccal/sublingual buprenorphine at pharmacies have been a focal point for policymakers, less attention has been paid to specific challenges to accessing buprenorphine monoproduct tablets, long-acting injectable (LAI) buprenorphine, and LAI naltrexone, the latter indicated for OUD and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Finally, long standing federal regulations prohibit pharmacies from dispensing methadone when prescribed for the treatment of OUD rather than for pain.51

Nonfulfillment of the Core Function to Dispense

In defining pharmacy practice, states traditionally include the core function to dispense lawful prescriptions but not necessarily a duty to so dispense.45,47,52 Washington, New Jersey, and California have enacted “duty to dispense” clauses;52–55 New Jersey’s law maintains pharmacy practice sites must properly dispense lawful prescriptions without undue delay.56 The inconsistent availability of buprenorphine for pharmacists to dispense lawful prescriptions promptly suggests certain factors are contributing to some pharmacists’ nonfulfillment of the core function to dispense, including misinterpretation of buprenorphine’s associated risks, and addiction stigma.22,24,26,57–67 Indeed, pharmacy organizations are establishing consensus-based guidelines for pharmacy access to buprenorphine.68 Factors resulting in nonfulfillment of the core function to dispense could be addressed by programs that facilitate the dispensing of opioid agonist medications lawfully prescribed for OUD, such as those providing financial incentives to retail pharmacies.22,69

Ambiguity Related to Pharmacists’ Corresponding Responsibility

Another determining factor contributing to access challenges at pharmacies is pharmacists’ application of, and attempts to resolve, red flags applied to buprenorphine prescribed for OUD under DEA policy, which is largely imposed on DEA-registered pharmacies and pharmacists through adjudication.70 Under DEA regulations, pharmacists have corresponding responsibility” with prescribing practitioners for the proper prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances.71 To be “effective,” controlled medication prescriptions must be “issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of his [sic] professional practice.71Knowingly filling” a purported prescription for a controlled substance that was not so issued is subject to penalties.71,72 While the DEA recommends best practices for identifying out of scope prescriptions in The DEA’s Pharmacists’ Manual,73 pharmacies must generally glean red flags from the DEA’s regular enforcement actions. These enforcement actions – for certain controlled medication dispensing practices when red flags suggestive of diversion were not resolved prior to dispensing – revoke pharmacies’ DEA registrations.70,74 Red flags commonly cited in such actions include pattern prescribing, patients traveling far distances, cocktail/drug combination or cash payment for prescription medication, therapeutic duplication, and doctor shopping.72 State boards of pharmacy may also levy fines, place on probation, suspend, or revoke licenses for not preventing diversion effectively.75

Other Legal Compliance Concerns

DEA-registered manufacturers and distributors must report “suspicious orders,” including unusual sizes, patterns, or frequencies of orders of controlled substances to the DEA and relevant division offices, which may be done through the DEA’s centralized database, the Suspicious Orders Report System (SORS) required by 2018 federal legislation.76,77 In 2023, the DEA clarified that neither the DEA, nor the CSA as amended in 2018, regulates the volume of controlled substances with quantitative thresholds that limit registrants’ ordering or dispensing, but rather requires registrants to design and operate a system to identify suspicious orders, which may involve the use of self-set purchasing thresholds.78

Settlement agreements among states attorneys general, including with Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS,79,80 and Cardinal Health, AmeriSourceBergen, and McKesson, the latter three denoted “Injunctive Relief Distributors” under an agreement effective July 2021, likely exacerbated legal compliance concerns, especially within retail chain pharmacies. The agreement with Injunctive Relief Distributors requires them to implement systems applying specific metrics for identifying “Red Flags,28 using specific dispensing datasets that are provided by their retail pharmacy customers to (1) review the total number and dosage units of dispensed prescription medications, (2) evaluate sales of controlled substances to cash-paying patients, (3) review the top prescribers of certain “highly diverted” controlled substances, and (4) consider the extent to which a pharmacy serves out-of-area patients.81 Under Injunctive Relief Distributors’ settlement agreement terms, “highly diverted” substances can include buprenorphine.28

The presence of patients at pharmacies who have an undefined distance to their prescriber, pay in cash, or use medication ‘slang,’ can cause some pharmacists not to dispense buprenorphine, and further, it can cause some pharmacists to require patients/prescribers to provide diagnostic codes on prescriptions, prescribers to confirm via telephone the patient’s medication dose or quantity or the prescribers’ location and specialty, or finally, for some pharmacists to state counterfactually that the pharmacy simply does not stock buprenorphine.24 Although the DEA advised registered distributors in March 2024 to reexamine self-set thresholds to ensure timely patient access to buprenorphine,82 buprenorphine dispensing challenges persist.83

Unique Challenges Related to Certain Addiction Medication Formulations

Buprenorphine is available alone (“BUP”) or in combination with naloxone (“BNX”), the latter intended to prevent misuse.84,85 Practice guidelines and payers’ restrictions discourage the prescription of BUP for OUD treatment unless a clinical exception applies.86 However, the addition of naloxone to buprenorphine may not add any real misuse deterrent utility,85,87 indicating the use of BUP outside those narrow clinical exceptions is also appropriate at the prescribers' professional discretion. After an initiation period with buccal/sublingual BNX or BUP, buprenorphine is available in a monthly or weekly LAI formulation (“Sublocade” or “Brixadi”)88 that eliminates daily dosing; however, both LAI medications are costly,89 their coverage made contingent on payers’ utilization management policies,90,91 and both are subject to a federally-required restricted distribution system (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy or “REMS”)92,93 intended to prevent their direct dispensing to patients and potential self-administration.94 Thus, REMS limits the ability to order and dispense Sublocade and Brixadi to only certified health care settings and pharmacies with procedures and processes in place that include prohibiting the distribution, transfer, loan, or sale of Sublocade and Brixadi.94

The prevalence of AUD exceeds that of OUD, and utilization rates of AUD-indicated medication are low, about 8 percent in 2019.21 The opioid antagonist medication naltrexone in LAI formulation is indicated and prescribed for both AUD and OUD. Factors driving underutilization of LAI naltrexone for either AUD or OUD, such as its expense, are of concern, as it has superior rates of adherence and retention compared to oral naltrexone.95,96 

Policies Elevating Pharmacists’ Role in Medications for Addiction Treatment

Advanced practice pharmacy rose out of a desire to meet societal needs for advancing patient care beyond preparing and dispensing medication.97 Today, many states authorize pharmacists under certain conditions to initiate and administer vaccines, naloxone, emergency contraceptives, HIV PrEP and PEP, and more.40,98–101 Furthermore, states are incorporating models for collaborative pharmacy practice care, which include (1) prescriber-pharmacist collaborative practice agreements (CPAs) (that may be patient- or population-specific, or statewide);102,103 (2) statewide standing orders or state-based protocols, and (3) independent, ‘tiered’ pharmacist licensing for advanced practice;41,105 only in specific cases do these models pertain to addiction medications. California, Idaho, Massachusetts, Montana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah, and Washington recognize DEA-registered, licensed pharmacists as mid-level practitioners, with various authorities to initiate, administer, procure, or dispense controlled substances.106 

Accreditation, Education, Credentialing, and Privileging for Advanced Practice Pharmacy Roles

In a final rule in 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) modified the definition of “medical staff” to include non-physician practitioners, allowing for credentialed and privileged advanced practice pharmacists to practice within health systems ‘at the top of their license’ in accordance with state laws and institutional bylaws for medical staff.107,108 However, the credentialing and privileging process for advanced practice pharmacists lacks standardization and is far less common than for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners.109–113 Although accreditation of pharmacy practice education has advanced significantly, including for the Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD), pharmacists gain the core competencies to provide clinical services in advanced practice roles through accredited residency/fellowship programs (or equivalent post-licensure experience) and board certification in one or more of the fifteen specialties of the Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS).35,37,111,114,115

While some states credential pharmacists with practice-based certificates, board certification by the BPS in a relevant specialty, such as the Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacist (BCPP),116 is considered the gold standard credential to qualify pharmacists for advanced practice.117 Institutional privileging, which formally recognizes pharmacists’ nonphysician provider status and expanded scope of practice, requires the navigation of intersecting state scope of practice laws and institutional bylaws, privileging varies with state boards’ documentation requirements for CPAs, and it further varies with CPAs that, in turn, contain a varying degree of required scrutiny of documentation.108 For CPAs, state boards generally require a fee and verification of pharmacists’ licensure and credentials (as defined by the state) and can include committee or administrative review processes of pharmacists’ intended scope of practice.108 Finally, the Joint Commission has privileging requirements for accreditation; to practice at institutions, pharmacists are subject to the focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) and ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE).118

Collaborative Pharmacy Practice in General

Innovative collaborative pharmacy practice models offer an exciting opportunity to improve access to essential health care services for vulnerable patient populations, and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) demonstrates this promise. At VHA facilities, all pharmacists are designated clinical pharmacists, with a subset designated clinical pharmacy specialists with facility-level agreements for advanced practice roles.119–122 The VHA’s collaborative pharmacy practice success is attributed to its foundational credentialing and privileging process,118 and has improved access to and care itself for veterans with addiction.123–130 Outside the VHA, many studies show that pharmacist-provided patient care services through forms of collaborative pharmacy practice benefit patient outcomes for certain chronic conditions, such as diabetes, depression, and hypertension.131–135

Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Models Improving Access to MOUD

The elimination of the federal DEA ‘X-waiver’ is a significant opportunity for states to remove barriers to forms of collaborative pharmacy practice to treat OUD.42,43,136,137 While the federal government continues to restrict dispensing of methadone to treat OUD to the nation’s 2,000 opioid treatment programs (OTPs), numbering far fewer than 61,000 community pharmacies,138 modernizing these federal restrictions can allow states a similar opportunity to realize important patient benefits.139 Preliminary evidence supports patient-specific collaborative practice agreements for buprenorphine and methadone to treat OUD, in public health departments, independent and community or behavioral health chain retail pharmacies, and acute care settings.140–144 Notably, in the studies discussed below, pharmacists provided critical patient care services that can be construed broadly as co-management of SUD and medication monitoring, however, the requirements for pharmacists’ education and training ranged widely, and physicians predominantly maintained responsibility for diagnosis and prescribing.140–144 Although resources are needed to expand this evidence base, physician(s)-pharmacist(s) collaborative practice can safely optimize patient care, improve medication adherence through co-management of SUD and medication monitoring,145 and save physicians’ time by reducing workload burden,146 helping to address persistent workforce shortages.146–150

In Maryland, a piloted physician–pharmacist buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) long-term treatment model improved care and retention for health department patients.140 In North Carolina, a feasible and acceptable model under an operational care agreement among office-based BNX prescribers, and three community pharmacies, authorized pharmacists over six months to manage transferred stable patients’ monthly prescription and long-term treatment visits; rates of adherence and retention rates were high, and no opioid-related safety events occurred.141 In Rhode Island, a physician-delegated, pharmacist-facilitated initiation of BNX treatment for OUD model under a state-registered physician-pharmacist CPA151 authorized specially-trained pharmacists to assess patients with OUD, determine medication regimens confirmed with X-waivered physicians, stabilize patients through initiating and adjusting treatment, and provide follow-up care to stabilized patients over one month; patients provided follow-up care from pharmacists had substantially higher rates of retention compared to those provided follow-up care from physicians.152

In Baltimore, under federal regulatory exemption, a CPA between an OTP and an independent retail pharmacy authorized OTP physicians to electronically prescribe methadone to stable patients and make dose adjustments. Pharmacists administered and dispensed methadone and provided follow-up care, including medication reconciliation and safety assessments, under the supervision of OTP physicians who kept federal/state records.142,143 Patients’ adherence and retention rates were 100 and 80 percent, respectively, at three months.142,143 Additionally, the prescribing and pharmacy dispensing of methadone for OUD has been successfully implemented for decades in other parts of the world, including in Great Britain, Australia, and Canada.153

Wide Variability in State-Based Protocols Improving Access to MOUD

Facing persistent workforce shortages, states have also enacted state-based protocols, in contrast to private contract-based CPAs, to address challenges to accessing MOUD. In 2019, Massachusetts authorized trained pharmacists and pharmacy interns to administer LAI naltrexone, after the first dose, to persons 18 or older, provided it is prescribed by a licensed clinician.154 The Nevada Board of Pharmacy recently promulgated a proposed regulation allowing separately-registered licensed pharmacists to make patient assessments for OUD (and for marriage and family therapists and clinical professional counselors may make such assessments as well), prescribe and dispense MOUD, and to be reimbursed for these services, without requiring specific education, training, or a CPA; however, it excludes administration of LAI medications.155 In addition, the Colorado Governor recently signed a bill into law that requires the state Board of Pharmacy to develop statewide protocols156 provide for pharmacists to prescribe, dispense, and administer MOUD.157

Limited Uptake of Tiered Licensure for Advance Practice Pharmacist Designations

Outside of statewide protocols, some states have used advanced practice pharmacist designations (‘tiered’ licensure) that grant pharmacists provider status to improve access to health care in general. Four states have had meager uptake of such designated licenses, including the Advanced Practice Pharmacist (APh) in California, the Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner in Montana and North Carolina (CPP), and the Pharmacist Clinician (PhC) in New Mexico, due to barriers including lack of awareness, and to reimbursement.105,158 For example, California’s model authorizes all licensed pharmacists to order and interpret tests and monitor and manage medication therapy. The model also allows additional authorities to pharmacists who obtain the APh that previously required a CPA (i.e., pharmacists who meet certification or residency requirements, or who have provided one year of clinical services).159,160 In 2022, two percent of licensed pharmacists had the APh in California.161

Recommendations

The 探花合集 recommends that:

1. Congress amend federal law to exempt controlled medication formulations approved by the FDA for the treatment of SUD (only) from federal suspicious order reporting requirements.

2. In the absence of Congressional action, the Department of Justice (DOJ)/the DEA clarify that no action will be taken against any party for excluding controlled medication formulations approved by the FDA for the treatment of SUD (only) in suspicious order reporting, paving the way for removal of such formulations from any related algorithms, threshold limits, or automated checks by manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies.

3. States enact or amend laws establishing pharmacy practice sites’ and/or pharmacists’ duty to dispense lawful prescriptions for addiction medications, including buprenorphine monoproduct tablets and buccal/sublingual buprenorphine products, without undue delay; pharmacies align corporate policies and store protocols accordingly.75

4. State attorneys general revisit and make necessary amendments to opioid settlement agreements to ensure adequate access to medications for OUD and overdose reversal, and remove provisions hindering access to controlled medication formulations approved by the FDA for the treatment of SUD (only).75

5. Federal and state authorities (including but not limited to those regulating licensed healthcare professionals or overseeing state prescription drug monitoring programs), public and private payers (and their drug utilization review boards and committees), and medical and pharmacy organizations carry out binding review processes to reconcile “red flag” or “suspicious order” policies currently subject to different policies, recommendations, and compliance requirements, including but not limited to those described in 21 USC 802(57)(A-C),77 relevant case law,72 The DEA’s Pharmacists’ Manual,162 Injunctive Relief Distributors’ settlement terms,28 and The Pharmacy Access to Resources and Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Guideline; such binding review processes should update and synchronize all policies to the extent under their respective control, and, as fundamental to these processes, any red flag policies should be removed that:

1. Inappropriately or unreasonably limit geographic distance between patient and prescriber or patient and pharmacy, especially considering increased utilization of telemedicine.

2. Limit patients to payment through insurance coverage.

3. Suspect dose increases for an individual patient.

4. Suspect and/or distinguish between BUP and other BNX products that are approved by the FDA to treat OUD.

5. Suspect patients receiving prescriptions from multiple providers from the same medical practice.

6. Require patients to provide a diagnostic code on their prescription.

7. Require prescribers’ verbal confirmation of prescription or practice details by telephone-only.

6. States exempt controlled medication products approved by the FDA for the treatment of SUD (only) from any state red flag laws and programs.75

7. The DEA and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) enhance messaging that buprenorphine is a Schedule III medication and should be considered differently from other opioids which are Schedule II. The DEA and HHS consider partnerships with nongovernmental organizations to further disseminate clear and consistent messaging, especially to Boards of Pharmacy and Controlled Substances Authorities at the state level.22

8. HHS make additional investments in educational opportunities to reduce stigmatization and clarify misperceptions about buprenorphine for the pharmacy and health care workforce, including as part of educational modules at residency programs, and during initial licensure and renewals for physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists.22

9. HHS continue to consult the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and Office of the General Counsel regarding denials of prescribed MOUD as possible violations of federal civil disability rights and federal civil rights laws governing other protected classes, including the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).22

10. HHS and state and local governments demonstrate and pilot programs enhancing access to MOUD, including programs that provide financial incentives to retail pharmacies to dispense such medications.22

11. States develop programs to promote best practices in, and incentivize appropriately qualified, licensed physicians and pharmacists to engage in, patient-specific collaborative practice agreements for addiction medications, including reimbursement for pharmacists services, provided that the CPAs: (1) require physicians first diagnose patients with substance use disorder (SUD); (2) described clearly pharmacists' physician-delegated authorities that may include initiating, modifying, or discontinuing prescribed medications; (3) require regular communication between physicians and pharmacists, (4) include qualifying requirements of some experience treating SUD or board certification in addiction medicine or addiction psychiatry for physicians, and accredited residency training or BPS board certification in a relevant specialty, such as the BCPP (Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacist), for pharmacists.

12. As federal restrictions on methadone dispensing for OUD are modernized, states, with assistance from nongovernmental organizations, develop a model protocol for CPAs to serve as a method to formalize communication between addiction specialist physician prescribers and pharmacists dispensing methadone for OUD.

13. States permit pharmacists’ administration of LAI addiction medications lawfully prescribed by a licensed clinician, provided such administration is not the first dose.

14. The FDA develop guidance clarifying the availability of REMS certification for Brixadi and Sublocade to all pharmacies that meet specified requirements, and widely disseminate such guidance; and further, the FDA clarify and widely disseminate its guidance that there is no requirement for REMS certification for healthcare settings intending to only obtain Brixadi or Sublocade from a REMS-certified pharmacy for practitioner administration at a specific-named patient’s scheduled appointment.  

15. Payers eliminate prior authorization requirements for all formulations of addiction medications and opt to cover pharmacist administration of LAI addiction medication with pharmacists as “other licensed practitioner.”163

16. States consider grant programs for piloting population-specific CPA models or non-CPA models for programs to improve access to addiction medications in high need communities, and states design, monitor, and evaluate such programs to generate data that informs policymakers on the safety, effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of those models.

17. Policymakers should consider, as best practice, physician-pharmacist CPA models to improve access to addiction medications in alignment with Recommendations 11 or 12, but if policymakers consider authorizing other models for addiction medications, policymakers should take the following measures at a minimum to ensure patient safety:

a. Prohibit pharmacists from making an SUD diagnosis independently;

b. Outline pharmacists’ scope of practice and formulary clearly;

c. Require some form of documentation and maintenance of records, including documentation of pharmacists’ communication with patients’ physicians or advanced practice clinicians; and

d. Require pharmacists have accredited residency training or BPS board certification in a relevant specialty, such as the BCPP, as the minimal acceptable qualification.  

 


Footnotes

Model language from the Model State Pharmacy Act and Model Rules of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy ("Model Act/Rules") of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy defines “collaborative pharmacy practice” as “that practice of pharmacy whereby one or more pharmacists have jointly agreed, on a voluntary basis, to work in conjunction with one or more practitioners under protocol and in collaboration with practitioner(s) to provide patient care services to achieve optimal medication use and desired patient outcomes.”

Other Injunctive Relief Distributor settlement agreement “Red Flags” are 1) ordering ratios of a) highly diverted controlled substances to non-controlled substances, b) highly diverted controlled substances (base codes or drug families) to non-controlled substances, 2) excessive ordering growth of controlled substances, and 3) unusual formulation ordering.

Collaborative practice agreements (CPAs) create formal relationships between, and delegate functions from, one or more prescribers (physicians and other licensed clinicians with prescriptive authority), to qualified pharmacists, to engage in collaborative drug therapy management. CPAs define the conditions that permit (or do not permit) pharmacists to assume responsibility for performing certain duties, including 1) patient assessments; 2) ordering medication–related laboratory tests; 3) administering medications; and 4) initiating, modifying, or discontinuing medication regimens for patients (or patient populations).104

Statewide standing orders are authorizations issued by a single prescriber allowing all pharmacists in a state to dispense medication(s) directly to a patient in certain scenarios. Typically, the person who issued the agreement is indicated on the prescriptions as the prescriber.103

State-based protocols provide the framework specifying the conditions under which qualified pharmacists are authorized to initiate or manage a specified medication or category of medications and usually do not permit, allow, or require pharmacists to make a diagnosis. Such protocols are issued by an authorized state body, often boards of pharmacy, pursuant to relevant state laws and regulations.

 


 

Adopted by the 探花合集 Board of Directors on July 18, 2024.

  © Copyright 2024. 探花合集, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for commercial, advertising or promotional purposes, and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, redistribution to lists, or other uses of this material require prior specific written permission or license from the Society. ASAM Public Policy Statements normally may be referenced in their entirety only without editing or paraphrasing, and with proper attribution to the society. Excerpting any statement for any purpose requires specific written permission from the Society. Public Policy statements of ASAM are revised on a regular basis; therefore, those wishing to utilize this document must ensure that it is the most current position of ASAM on the topic addressed.


References
1. Esser MB. Deaths from Excessive Alcohol Use — United States, 2016–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7308a1
2. Esser MB, Leung G, Sherk A, et al. Estimated Deaths Attributable to Excessive Alcohol Use Among US Adults Aged 20 to 64 Years, 2015 to 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(11):e2239485. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39485
3. Maleki N, Yunusa I, Karaye IM. Alcohol-Induced Mortality in the USA: Trends from 1999 to 2020. Int J Ment Health Addict. Published online June 6, 2023:1-13. doi:10.1007/s11469-023-01083-1
4. Athey A, Kilmer B, Cerel J. An Overlooked Emergency: More Than One in Eight US Adults Have Had Their Lives Disrupted by Drug Overdose Deaths. Am J Public Health. 2024;114(3):276-279. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2023.307550
5. Spillane S, Shiels MS, Best AF, et al. Trends in Alcohol-Induced Deaths in the United States, 2000-2016. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(2):e1921451. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21451
6. White AM, Castle IP, Hingson RW, Powell PA. Using Death Certificates to Explore Changes in Alcohol鈥怰elated Mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2017. Alcoholism Clin & Exp Res. 2020;44(1):178-187. doi:10.1111/acer.14239
7. Valentine C, Bauld L, Walter T. Bereavement Following Substance Misuse: A Disenfranchised Grief. Omega (Westport). 2016;72(4):283-301. doi:10.1177/0030222815625174
8. Jones CM, Zhang K, Han B, et al. Estimated Number of Children Who Lost a Parent to Drug Overdose in the US From 2011 to 2021. JAMA Psychiatry. Published online May 8, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0810
9. Kennedy-Hendricks A, Ettman CK, Gollust SE, et al. Experience of Personal Loss Due to Drug Overdose Among US Adults. JAMA Health Forum. 2024;5(5):e241262. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1262
10. Heimer R, Black AC, Lin H, et al. Receipt of opioid use disorder treatments prior to fatal overdoses and comparison to no treatment in Connecticut, 2016–17. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2024;254:111040. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111040
11. Abraham AJ, Andrews CM, Harris SJ, Friedmann PD. Availability of Medications for the Treatment of Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorder in the USA. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(1):55-69. doi:10.1007/s13311-019-00814-4
12. Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, Jent V, Keyes KM, Jones CM, Cerdá M. Has the treatment gap for opioid use disorder narrowed in the U.S.?: A yearly assessment from 2010 to 2019". Int J Drug Policy. Published online July 19, 2022:103786. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103786
13. Qian G, Humphreys K, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Brandeau ML. Estimated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of opioid use disorder treatment under proposed U.S. regulatory relaxations: A model-based analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2024;256:111112. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111112
14. Avanceña ALV, Miller N, Uttal SE, Hutton DW, Mellinger JL. Cost-effectiveness of alcohol use treatments in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. 2021;74(6):1286-1294. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.12.004
15. Baker CL, Pietri G. A cost-effectiveness analysis of varenicline for smoking cessation using data from the EAGLES trial. CEOR. 2018;Volume 10:67-74. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S153897
16. Onuoha EN, Leff JA, Schackman BR, McCollister KE, Polsky D, Murphy SM. Economic Evaluations of Pharmacologic Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review. Value in Health. 2021;24(7):1068-1083. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.023
17. Centers for Disease Control and Injury Prevention. Smoking Cessation—The Role of Healthcare Professionals and Health Systems. Published November 8, 2023. Accessed February 2, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/2020-smoking-cessation/fact-sheets/healthcare-professionals-health-systems/index.html
18. | National Institute on Drug Abuse. What are treatments for tobacco dependence? Published --. Accessed February 2, 2024. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/tobacco-nicotine-e-cigarettes/what-are-treatments-tobacco-dependence
19. Santo T Jr, Clark B, Hickman M, et al. Association of Opioid Agonist Treatment With All-Cause Mortality and Specific Causes of Death Among People With Opioid Dependence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(9):979-993. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0976
20. Witkiewitz K, Litten RZ, Leggio L. Advances in the science and treatment of alcohol use disorder | Science Advances. Published September 25, 2019. Accessed February 2, 2024. https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.aax4043
21. Han B, Jones CM, Einstein EB, Powell PA, Compton WM. Use of Medications for Alcohol Use Disorder in the US: Results From the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(8):922-924. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1271
22. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration. Policy Priority Roundtable Summary Report. Published online 2024. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/policy-priority-roundtable-buprenorphine-access-pharmacies.pdf
23. Kumar R, Viswanath O, Saadabadi A. Buprenorphine. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed June 6, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459126/
24. Textor L, Ventricelli D, Aronowitz SV. ‘Red Flags’ and ‘Red Tape’: Telehealth and pharmacy-level barriers to buprenorphine in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2022;105:103703. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103703
25. National Institute on Drug Abuse. What is the treatment need versus the diversion risk for opioid use disorder treatment? Published --. Accessed May 9, 2024. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/medications-to-treat-opioid-addiction/what-treatment-need-versus-diversion-risk-opioid-use-disorder-treatment
26. U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Diversion Control Division. NFLIS-Drug 2022 Annual Report. Published online 2023. https://www.nflis.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/nflisdata/docs/2022NFLIS-DrugAnnualReport.pdf
27. Cicero TJ, Ellis MS, Chilcoat HD. Understanding the use of diverted buprenorphine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2018;193:117-123. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.007
28. Distributor Settlement Agreement between Settling States, Settling Distributors, and Participating Subdivisions. Published online March 25, 2022. https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Final_Distributor_Settlement_Agreement_3.25.22_Final.pdf
29. National Opioids Settlement. Accessed May 26, 2024. https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/
30. Berenbrok LA, Tang S, Gabriel N, et al. Access to community pharmacies: A nationwide geographic information systems cross-sectional analysis. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2022;62(6):1816-1822.e2. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2022.07.003
31. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pharmacists. Published May 2023. Accessed April 8, 2024. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes291051.htm#nat
32. Wittenauer R, Shah PD, Bacci JL, Stergachis A. Locations and characteristics of pharmacy deserts in the United States: a geospatial study. Health Affairs Scholar. 2024;2(4):qxae035. doi:10.1093/haschl/qxae035
33. Bluml BM. Definition of Medication Therapy Management: Development of Professionwide Consensus. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2005;45(5):566-572. doi:10.1331/1544345055001274
34. Blalock SJ, Roberts AW, Lauffenburger JC, Thompson T, O’Connor SK. The Effect of Community Pharmacy–Based Interventions on Patient Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(3):235-266. doi:10.1177/1077558712459215
35. American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Standards of practice for clinical pharmacists. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2023;6(10):1156-1159. doi:10.1002/jac5.1873
36. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. The Model State Pharmacy Act and Model Rules of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (“Model Act/Rules”). Published online August 2023. Accessed May 9, 2024. https://nabp.pharmacy/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/NABP-Model-Act-August-2023.docx
37. Giberson S, Yoder S, Lee MP. Improving Patient and Health System Outcomes through Advanced Pharmacy Practice. A Report to the U.S. Surgeon General. Published online 2011. https://jcpp.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Improving-Patient-and-Health-System-Outcomes-through-Advanced-Pharmacy-Practice.pdf
38. Munger MA, Green JA, Greve PA, Lovejoy LS. Professional Liability for Pharmacists: A Focus on Pharmacy Practice Acts. Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy. 1988;22(11):886-888. doi:10.1177/106002808802201111
39. Adams AJ. Regulating Pharmacy Practice: An “Addition by Subtraction” Model. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice. 2024;71(1):40-42. doi:10.37901/cpha24-02
40. Adams AJ, Weaver KK. The Continuum of Pharmacist Prescriptive Authority. Ann Pharmacother. 2016;50(9):778-784. doi:10.1177/1060028016653608
41. O’Sullivan TA, Danielson J, Weber SS. Qualitative Analysis of Common Definitions for Core Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(5):91. doi:10.5688/ajpe78591
42. Chua KP, Bicket MC, Bohnert ASB, Conti RM, Lagisetty P, Nguyen TD. Buprenorphine Dispensing after Elimination of the Waiver Requirement. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(16):1530-1532. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2312906
43. Adams JA, Chopski NL, Adams AJ. Opportunities for pharmacist prescriptive authority of buprenorphine following passage of the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023;63(5):1495-1499. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2023.06.001
44. American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Key state-level policy elements governing pharmacist collaborative practice. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 2022;5(7):725-728. doi:10.1002/jac5.1654
45. Young MD, Stilling WJ, Munger MA. Pharmacy Practice Acts: A Decade of Progress. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33(9):920-926. doi:10.1345/aph.18467
46. Munger MA, Stilling WJ, Gardner SF. Pharmacy Practice Acts: A Five-Year Follow-up. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27(5):560-565. doi:10.1177/106002809302700504
47. Adams AJ. Regulating Pharmacy Practice: Analysis of Pharmacy Laws in Ten States. Innov Pharm. 2020;11(4):10.24926/iip.v11i4.3344. doi:10.24926/iip.v11i4.3344
48. Chisholm-Burns MA, Lee JK, Spivey CA, et al. US pharmacists’ effect as team members on patient care: systematic review and meta-analyses. In: Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-Assessed Reviews [Internet]. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 2010. Accessed April 21, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK80549/
49. Meyerson N. Walmart will close all of its health care clinics | CNN Business. Accessed May 1, 2024. https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/business/walmart-closes-health-clinics/index.html
50. Wash A, Moczygemba LR, Brown CM, Crismon ML, Whittaker TA. A narrative review of the well-being and burnout of U.S. community pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024;64(2):337-349. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2023.11.017
51. Dooling B, Stanley L. A Vast and Discretionary Regime: Federal Regulation of Methadone As A Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. Published online August 11, 2022. https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs4751/files/2022-08/gw-reg-studies_report_federal-methadone-regulations_bdooling-and-lstanley.pdf
52. Achey TS, Robertson AT. Conscientious Objection: A Review of State Pharmacy Laws and Regulations. Hosp Pharm. 2022;57(2):268-272. doi:10.1177/00185787211024217
53. Emergency Contraception | Guttmacher Institute. Published March 14, 2016. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/emergency-contraception
54. Yang YT, Sawicki NN. Pharmacies’ Duty to Dispense Emergency Contraception: A Discussion of Religious Liberty. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017;129(3):551-553. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001894
55. Qato DM, Watanabe JH, Clark KJ. Federal and State Pharmacy Regulations and Dispensing Barriers to Buprenorphine Access at Retail Pharmacies in the US. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(8):e222839. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2839
56. Section 45:14-67.1 - Duty of pharmacy to fill certain prescriptions, N.J. Stat. § 45:14-67.1 | Casetext Search + Citator. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://casetext.com/statute/new-jersey-statutes/title-45-professions-and-occupations/chapter-4514/section-4514-671-duty-of-pharmacy-to-fill-certain-prescriptions
57. Hill LG, Light AE, Green TC, Burns AL, Zadeh PS, Freeman PR. Perceptions, policies, and practices related to dispensing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: A national survey of community-based pharmacists. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. Published online August 24, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2022.08.017
58. Thornton JD, Lyvers E, Scott VGG, Dwibedi N. Pharmacists’ readiness to provide naloxone in community pharmacies in West Virginia. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017;57(2S):S12-S18.e4. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.070
59. Hill LG, Loera LJ, Evoy KE, et al. Availability of buprenorphine/naloxone films and naloxone nasal spray in community pharmacies in Texas, USA. Addiction. 2021;116(6):1505-1511. doi:10.1111/add.15314
60. Kazerouni NJ, Irwin AN, Levander XA, et al. Pharmacy-related buprenorphine access barriers: An audit of pharmacies in counties with a high opioid overdose burden. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2021;224:108729. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108729
61. Hill LG, Loera LJ, Torrez SB, et al. Availability of buprenorphine/naloxone films and naloxone nasal spray in community pharmacies in 11 U.S. states. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022;237:109518. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109518
62. Cooper HL, Cloud DH, Freeman PR, et al. Buprenorphine dispensing in an epicenter of the U.S. opioid epidemic: A case study of the rural risk environment in Appalachian Kentucky. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;85:102701. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102701
63. Ostrach B, Carpenter D, Cote LP. DEA Disconnect Leads to Buprenorphine Bottlenecks. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2021;15(4):272-275. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000762
64. Ostrach B, Potter R, Wilson CG, Carpenter D. Ensuring buprenorphine access in rural community pharmacies to prevent overdoses. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2022;62(2):588-597.e2. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2021.10.002
65. Trull G, Major E, Harless C, Zule W, Ostrach B, Carpenter D. Rural community pharmacist willingness to dispense Suboxone® - A secret shopper investigation in South-Central Appalachia. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy. 2021;4:100082. doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100082
66. Freeman PR, Hammerslag LR, Ahrens KA, et al. Barriers to Buprenorphine Dispensing by Medicaid-Participating Community Retail Pharmacies. JAMA Health Forum. 2024;5(5):e241077. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1077
67. Light AE, Green TC, Freeman PR, Zadeh PS, Burns AL, Hill LG. Relationships Between Stigma, Risk Tolerance, and Buprenorphine Dispensing Intentions Among Community-Based Pharmacists: Results From a National Sample. Substance Use & Addiction Journal. Published online January 4, 2024:29767342231215178. doi:10.1177/29767342231215178
68. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy NCPA. Buprenorphine Guidelines | OUD Treatment by Pharmacists. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. Published April 15, 2024. Accessed April 19, 2024. https://nabp.pharmacy/buprenorphine-guidelines/
69. Neeraj Sood P, Shih T, Karen Van Nuys P, Dana Goldman P. Flow of Money Through the Pharmaceutical Distribution System. Published online June 6, 2017. doi:10.25549/hypg-r802
70. Stanley L. Policemaking Through Adjudication: DEA’s Red Flags. Published online August 12, 2022. https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs4751/files/2022-08/gwrsc_dea_red_flags_commentary_2022_08_12.pdf
71. 21 CFR 1306.04 -- Purpose of issue of prescription. Accessed April 30, 2024. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/part-1306/section-1306.04
72. John A. Gilbert. The Pharmacist’s Coresponding Responsibility: Evolving Legal and Regulatory Requirements. Presented at: National Association of State Controlled Substances Authorities Annual Conference October 25-28, 2021; October 26, 2021. https://www.nascsa.org/documents/JohnGilbert-10-26-2021-am.pptx.pdf
73. U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Diversion Control Division. The Pharmacist’s Manual: An Informational Outline of the Controlled Substances Act. Published online 2022. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/GDP/(DEA-DC-046R1)(EO-DEA154R1)_Pharmacist%27s_Manual_DEA.pdf
74. Parker J. DEA shuts down pharmacy for fulfilling addiction treatment prescriptions. KevinMD.com. Published May 1, 2024. Accessed May 8, 2024. https://www.kevinmd.com/2024/05/dea-shuts-down-pharmacy-for-fulfilling-addiction-treatment-prescriptions.html
75. Harris KN. How Our Overdose Crisis Response Is Delayed At The Pharmacy. Health Affairs Forefront. Published online May 14, 2024. doi:10.1377/forefront.20240513.57754
76. Diversion Control Division | Suspicious Orders Report System (SORS). Accessed April 19, 2024. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/sors/sors.html
77. the Office of the Law Revision Counsel , U.S. House of Representatives. 21 USC 802(57)(A-C). Accessed May 16, 2024. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section802&num=0&edition=prelim
78. Drug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Division. DEA-Registered Manufacturer and Distributor Established Controlled Substance Quantitative Thresholds and the Requirements to Report Suspicious Orders Guidance Document. Published online January 20, 2023. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/GDP/(DEA-DC-065)(EO-DEA258)_Q_A_SOR_and_Thresholds_(Final).pdf
79. FAQ & Explanatory Charts – National Opioids Settlement. Accessed May 26, 2024. https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/faq-explanatory-charts/
80. Distributor Janssen Settlements – National Opioids Settlement. Accessed June 5, 2024. https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/distributor-janssen-settlements/
81. Cardinal Health. Communication re Proposed Opioid Litigation Comprehensive Settlement and Injunctive Relief Terms That May Impact Retail Pharmacy Customers. Published online February 25, 2022. https://www.cardinalhealth.com/content/dam/corp/web/documents/Report/cardinal-health-injunctive-relief-terms-20220225.pdf
82. Drug Enforcement Administration. Letter to DEA Registrants on Quantitative Thresholds. Published online March 2024. https://www.medcentral.com/addiction-med/oud/the-quest-to-fill-suboxone-prescriptions
83. Weiner SG, Qato DM, Faust JS, Clear B. Pharmacy Availability of Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in the US. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(5):e2316089. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16089
84. Kelty E, Cumming C, Troeung L, Hulse G. Buprenorphine alone or with naloxone: Which is safer? J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(3):344-352. doi:10.1177/0269881118756015
85. Blazes CK, Morrow JD. Reconsidering the Usefulness of Adding Naloxone to Buprenorphine. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.549272
86. Grande LA. Prescribing the Buprenorphine Monoproduct for Adverse Effects of Buprenorphine-Naloxone. J Addict Med. 2022;16(1):4-6. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000837
87. Gregg J, Hartley J, Lawrence D, Risser A, Blazes C. The Naloxone Component of Buprenorphine/Naloxone: Discouraging Misuse, but at What Cost? Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2023;17(1):7. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000001030
88. Heidbreder C, Fudala PJ, Greenwald MK. History of the discovery, development, and FDA-approval of buprenorphine medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports. 2023;6:100133. doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100133
89. Clemens-Cope L, Winiski E, Epstein M, Basurto L. Medicaid Prescriptions for Extended-Release Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder: State Trends from 2011 to 2018. Published online April 2020. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/102015/medicaid-prescriptions-for-extended-release-medications-to-treat-opioid-.pdf
90. Hammerslag LR, Talbert J, Slavova S, et al. Utilization of long-acting injectable monthly depot buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in Kentucky, before and after COVID-19 related buprenorphine access policy changes. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment. Published online May 11, 2024:209391. doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209391
91. Dana SR, Nichols SD, McCall KL, Piper BJ. Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Medicaid Prescribing of Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder (2019–2020). J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024;85(1):19-25. doi:10.15288/jsad.22-00373
92. Food and Drug Administration. Approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) | Brixadi. Published May 23, 2023. Accessed May 21, 2024. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/rems/index.cfm?event=IndvRemsDetails.page&REMS=418
93. Food and Drug Administration. Approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) | Sublocade. Published 4/192024. Accessed May 21, 2024. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/rems/index.cfm?event=IndvRemsDetails.page&REMS=376
94. Indivior. Sublocade Fact Sheet. Accessed May 2, 2024. https://www.indivior.com/admin/resources/dam/id/652/SUBLOCADE-Fact-Sheet.pdf
95. Crits-Christoph P, Lundy C, Stringer M, Gallop R, Gastfriend DR. Extended-Release Naltrexone for Alcohol and Opioid Problems in Missouri Parolees and Probationers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2015;56:54-60. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2015.03.003
96. Gastfriend DR. Intramuscular extended-release naltrexone: current evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2011;1216(1):144-166. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05900.x
97. Miller RR. History of Clinical Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology. The Journal of Clinical Pharma. 1981;21(4):195-197. doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1981.tb05699.x
98. Hogue MD, Grabenstein JD, Foster SL, Rothholz MC. Pharmacist Involvement with Immunizations: A Decade of Professional Advancement. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2006;46(2):168-182. doi:10.1331/154434506776180621
99. National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations. 2023 Provider Status End-of-Year Legislative Update. NASPA. Published January 12, 2024. Accessed April 12, 2024. https://naspa.us/blog/resource/2023-provider-status-end-of-year-legislative-update/
100. Gubbins PO, Klepser ME, Adams AJ, Jacobs DM, Percival KM, Tallman GB. Potential for Pharmacy-Public Health Collaborations Using Pharmacy-Based Point-of-Care Testing Services for Infectious Diseases. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017;23(6):593-600. doi:10.1097/PHH.0000000000000482
101. Roberts GE, Rubin SE, Smith JK, Adams AJ, Klepser DG. Public Health Perceptions of Community Pharmacy Partnership Opportunities. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2015;21(4):413. doi:10.1097/PHH.0000000000000276
102. Center for Disease Control and Injury Prevention. Advancing Team-Based Care Through Collaborative Practice Agreements. Published online 2019.
103. Pharmacy AC of C. Key state-level policy elements governing pharmacist collaborative practice. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 2022;5(7):725-728. doi:10.1002/jac5.1654
104. American College of Clinical Pharmacy, McBane SE, Dopp AL, et al. Collaborative drug therapy management and comprehensive medication management-2015. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(4):e39-50. doi:10.1002/phar.1563
105. Frost TP, Adams AJ. Are advanced practice pharmacist designations really advanced? Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2018;14(5):501-504. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.10.002
106. DEA Diversion Control. Mid-Level Practitioners Authorization by State. Published online December 22, 2022. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugreg/practioners/mlp_by_state.pdf
107. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Final Rule | 42 CFR Parts 482 and 485 | Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Reform of Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Conditions of Participation. Published online May 16, 2012. https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/cfcsandcops/downloads/cms-3244-f.pdf
108. Jordan TA, Hennenfent JA, Lewin JJ, Nesbit TW, Weber R. Elevating pharmacists’ scope of practice through a health-system clinical privileging process. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2016;73(18):1395-1405. doi:10.2146/ajhp150820
109. Burns AL. Emerging Developments in Pharmacists’ Scope of Practice to Address Unmet Health Care Needs - Anne L. Burns, 2016. Published July 19, 2016. Accessed March 13, 2024. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1060028016655351
110. Jones S. An Introduction: The Difference Between Credentialing and Privileging. MedTrainer. Published February 13, 2022. Accessed April 13, 2024. https://medtrainer.com/blog/an-introduction-the-difference-between-credentialing-and-privileging/
111. Janis S. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education – Setting the standard in pharmacy education. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Published January 2024. Accessed April 13, 2024. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/
112. Galt KA. Credentialing and privileging for pharmacists. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2004;61(7):661-670. doi:10.1093/ajhp/61.7.661
113. Dodd MA, Haines SL, Maack B, et al. ASHP Statement on the Role of Pharmacists in Primary Care. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2022;79(22):2070-2078. doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxac227
114. Rutkowski B. Specific Disciplines Addressing Substance Use: AMERSA in the 21st Century. Published online 2018. https://amersa.org/wp-content/uploads/AMERSA-Competencies-Final-31119.pdf
115. American Medical Association. Issue Brief - Pharmacists: Considerations for lawmakers before expanding pharmacists’ scope of practice. Published online 2022.
116. Goldstone LW, DiPaula BA, Werremeyer A, et al. The Role of Board-Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists in Expanding Access to Care and Improving Patient Outcomes. PS. 2021;72(7):794-801. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000066
117. Lee M, Saseen JJ, Beckman E, et al. Expanding the pharmacist’s scope of practice at the state level: Support for board certification within the credentialing process. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019;2(6):694-701. doi:10.1002/jac5.1192
118. McFarland MS, Groppi J, Ourth H, et al. Establishing a standardized clinical pharmacy practice model within the Veterans Health Administration: Evolution of the credentialing and professional practice evaluation process. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 2018;1(2):113-118. doi:10.1002/jac5.1022
119. Ourth H, Groppi J, Morreale AP, Quicci-Roberts K. Clinical pharmacist prescribing activities in the Veterans Health Administration. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2016;73(18):1406-1415. doi:10.2146/ajhp150778
120. McFarland MS, Groppi J, Jorgenson T, et al. Role of the US Veterans Health Administration Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Provider: Shaping the Future of Comprehensive Medication Management. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020;73(2):152-158.
121. McFarland MS, Buck ML, Crannage E, et al. Assessing the Impact of Comprehensive Medication Management on Achievement of the Quadruple Aim. The American Journal of Medicine. 2021;134(4):456-461. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.12.008
122. McFarland MS, Finks SW, Smith L, Buck ML, Ourth H, Brummel A. Medication Optimization: Integration of Comprehensive Medication Management into Practice. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2021;14(3):111-114.
123. Pals H, Bratberg J. Improving access to care via psychiatric clinical pharmacist practitioner collaborative management of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2022;62(4):1422-1429. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2022.03.006
124. Dimitropoulos E, Bertucci S, Wong K. Integration of a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist into a Substance use Disorder Intensive Outpatient Treatment Program to Improve Prescribing Rates of Alcohol use Disorder Pharmacotherapy. Substance Abuse. 2018;39(2):190-192. doi:10.1080/08897077.2018.1449172
125. Ehrhard K, Colvard M, Brabson J. Addition of a clinical pharmacist practitioner to an inpatient addiction triage team and related medication outcomes. Mental Health Clinician. 2022;12(4):219-224. doi:10.9740/mhc.2022.08.219
126. Mailloux LM, Haas MT, Larew JM, DeJongh BM. Development and implementation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative practice model for provision and management of buprenorphine/naloxone. Ment Health Clin. 2021;11(1):35-39. doi:10.9740/mhc.2021.01.035
127. Chen T, Kazerooni R, Vannort EM, et al. Comparison of an intensive pharmacist-managed telephone clinic with standard of care for tobacco cessation in a veteran population. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(4):512-520. doi:10.1177/1524839913509816
128. Wu S, Frey T, Wenthur CJ. Naloxone acceptance by outpatient veterans: A risk-prioritized telephone outreach event. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2021;17(5):1017-1020. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.010
129. Lin LA, Bohnert ASB, Blow FC, et al. Polysubstance use and association with opioid use disorder treatment in the US Veterans Health Administration. Addiction. 2021;116(1):96-104. doi:10.1111/add.15116
130. Davis B, Qian J, Ngorsuraches S, Jeminiwa R, Garza KB. The clinical impact of pharmacist services on mental health collaborative teams: A systematic review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60(5 Suppl):S44-S53. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2020.05.006
131. Hirsch JD, Steers N, Adler DS, et al. Primary Care–based, Pharmacist–physician Collaborative Medication-therapy Management of Hypertension: A Randomized, Pragmatic Trial. Clinical Therapeutics. 2014;36(9):1244-1254. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.030
132. Polgreen LA, Han J, Carter BL, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of a Physician–Pharmacist Collaboration Intervention to Improve Blood Pressure Control. Hypertension. 2015;66(6):1145-1151. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06023
133. Wagner TD, Jones MC, Salgado TM, Dixon DL. Pharmacist’s role in hypertension management: a review of key randomized controlled trials. J Hum Hypertens. 2020;34(7):487-494. doi:10.1038/s41371-020-0331-7
134. Finley PR, Rens HR, Pont JT, et al. Impact of a Collaborative Care Model on Depression in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2003;23(9):1175-1185. doi:10.1592/phco.23.10.1175.32760
135. Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, Richards D, Sutton AJ. Collaborative Care for Depression: A Cumulative Meta-analysis and Review of Longer-term Outcomes. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166(21):2314-2321. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.21.2314
136. Jones CM, Olsen Y, Ali MM, et al. Characteristics and Prescribing Patterns of Clinicians Waivered to Prescribe Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Before and After Release of New Practice Guidelines. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(7):e231982. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1982
137. Stein BD, Saloner BK, Golan OK, et al. Association of Selected State Policies and Requirements for Buprenorphine Treatment With Per Capita Months of Treatment. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(5):e231102. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1102
138. Joudrey PJ, Chadi N, Roy P, et al. Pharmacy-based methadone dispensing and drive time to methadone treatment in five states within the United States: A cross-sectional study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;211:107968. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107968
139. Methadone Tx for OUD Policymaker Resources. Default. Accessed May 10, 2024. /advocacy/national-advocacy/methadonetxoud
140. DiPaula BA, Menachery E. Physician–pharmacist collaborative care model for buprenorphine-maintained opioid-dependent patients. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2015;55(2):187-192. doi:10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14177
141. Wu LT, John WS, Ghitza UE, et al. Buprenorphine physician-pharmacist collaboration in the management of patients with opioid use disorder: Results from a multisite study of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Addiction. 2021;116(7):1805-1816. doi:10.1111/add.15353
142. Wu LT, John WS, Morse ED, et al. Opioid treatment program and community pharmacy collaboration for methadone maintenance treatment: results from a feasibility clinical trial. Addiction. 2022;117(2):444-456. doi:10.1111/add.15641
143. Wu LT, Mannelli P, John WS, Anderson A, Schwartz RP. Pharmacy-based methadone treatment in the US: views of pharmacists and opioid treatment program staff. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023;18(1):55. doi:10.1186/s13011-023-00563-w
144. Irwin MN, Walkerly A. Role of the pharmacist in acute care interventions for opioid use disorder: A scoping review. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 2022;5(2):193-202. doi:10.1002/jac5.1547
145. Kini V, Ho PM. Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence: A Review. JAMA. 2018;320(23):2461-2473. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19271
146. Miskle B, Lynch A. How Adding A Clinical Pharmacist Improves Access to Addiction Care. Published online March 9, 2023. https://pcssnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Collaborative-Care_AAPP_AAAP_PCSS_final.pdf
147. American Academy of Psychiatric Pharmacists. How Adding a Clinical Pharmacist Improves Access to Addiction Care. Providers Clinical Support System-Medications for Opioid Use Disorders. Published March 9, 2023. Accessed June 7, 2024. https://pcssnow.org/courses/how-adding-a-clinical-pharmacist-improves-access-to-addiction-care/
148. American Academy of Psychiatric Pharmacists. Issue Brief: Addressing the Treatment Gap for Opioid and Substance Use Disorders. Published online 2023. Accessed June 7, 2024. https://aapp.org/_docs/govt/2021/brief/sud/brief-sud.pdf
149. Mattle AG, Aladeen T, Blondell RD, Capote H, Rainka M. Evaluating outcomes of a clinical pharmacist medication management program in a multidisciplinary practice for outpatient buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 2021;4(4):424-434. doi:10.1002/jac5.1405
150. Haag JD, Yost KJ, Kosloski Tarpenning KA, et al. Effect of an Integrated Clinical Pharmacist on the Drivers of Provider Burnout in the Primary Care Setting. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(3):553-560. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200597
151. Supplementary Appendix to: Green TC, Sarfinski R, Clark SA, et al. Physician-delegated unobserved indicution with buprenorphine in pharmacies. N Engl J Med 2023;388:185-6 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2208055. Published online January 12, 2023. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMc2208055/suppl_file/nejmc2208055_appendix.pdf
152. Green TC, Serafinski R, Clark SA, Rich JD, Bratberg J. Physician-Delegated Unobserved Induction with Buprenorphine in Pharmacies. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(2):185-186. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2208055
153. Izquierdo B, McGaffney F, Doyle S. How Can Patients Access Methadone in Other Countries? Accessed June 6, 2024. https://pew.org/3M8T297
154. Circular: DCP 19-2-105 Pharmacist Administration of Medications for the treatment of Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder | Mass.gov. Accessed April 21, 2024. https://www.mass.gov/news/circular-dcp-19-2-105-pharmacist-administration-of-medications-for-the-treatment-of-mental-illness-and-substance-use-disorder
155. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy. Proposed Regulation of Nevada State Board of Pharmacy. Published online September 2023. https://bop.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/bopnvgov/content/board/ALL/2023_Meetings/Workshop%20D%20WS%20Proposed%20Amendment%20to%20NAC%20MOUD%20-%20AB%20156%20-%20FINAL.pdf
156. Colorado Consortium for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention. HB24-1045 – Treatment for Substance Use Disorders. Colorado Consortium for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention - Legislature. Published 2024. Accessed July 16, 2024. https://corxconsortium.org/resources/legislature/
157. Will P, Mullica K, Kennedy C deGruy, Armagost R. HB24-1045: Treatment for Substance Use Disorders | Colorado State Assembly.; 2024. https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb24-1045
158. Pham NYT, Yon CM, Anderson JR, et al. Awareness and perceptions of advanced practice pharmacists among health care providers in New Mexico. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2021;61(1):101-108. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2020.10.001
159. Lomanto M, Ly H, Brooks J, et al. Effect of the Advanced Practice Pharmacist License on Pharmacists’ Scope of Practice in California. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice. 2021;68(2):16-23. doi:10.37901/jcphp20-00004
160. Reyes LD, Hong J, Lin C, Hamper J, Kroon L. Community Pharmacists’ Motivation and Barriers to Providing and Billing Patient Care Services. Pharmacy (Basel). 2020;8(3):145. doi:10.3390/pharmacy8030145
161. Adams AJ, Frost TP. Implementation of the California advanced practice pharmacist and the continued disappointment of tiered licensure. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023;12:100353. doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100353
162. DEA Diversion Control Division. Pharmacist’s Manual: An Informational Outline of the Controlled Substances Act. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/GDP/(DEA-DC-046)(EO-DEA154)_Pharmacist_Manual.pdf
163. Schweitzer P, Atalla M. Medicaid reimbursement for pharmacist services: A strategy for the pharmacy profession. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2021;78(5):408-415. doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxaa390